The Enterprise Guide to AWS Cloud Migration

Enterprise cloud migrations fail in predictable ways. The migration project team undervalues the complexity of its application's dependency requirements. Instead of modernizing its workload's architecture, which would enable leveraging of cloud services, the migration team migrates it as is to pay for cloud-based applications using an on-premise pricing model. The security and compliance measures put in place for the on-premise environment are not set up to protect the cloud before migrating the workload to it. The post-migration cost optimization activities required to validate the migration business case are never carried out, as the migration team is already working on its next big priority project.

Mobisoft's enterprise cloud migration practice is built on a structured framework: the AWS MAP Migration Acceleration Programme phases, the AWS migration strategy 7 Rs, AWS MGN application migration for automated server replication, AWS DMS database migration for database migration, and the AWS Well-Architected Framework review for post-migration architecture review. This framework prevents each of these failure modes systematically.

Why Enterprise Cloud Migrations Fail: The Five Structural Failure Modes and How a Structured Framework Prevents Them

Enterprise cloud migration projects have a higher failure rate than most enterprise technology initiatives. This is not because the technology is unreliable. AWS infrastructure is significantly more reliable than the on-premises infrastructure most enterprises are migrating from. The problem is that the migration approach consistently underestimates the complexity of the enterprise's application portfolio and consistently overestimates the readiness of the organisation's people and processes for the post-migration operating model.

The Five Structural Migration Failure Modes

The table below maps each failure mode to its financial consequence and shows how the MAP framework prevents it systematically.

The AWS MAP Migration Acceleration Programme: Three Phases That Prevent Migration Failure

The AWS MAP Migration Acceleration Programme is the structured framework that Mobisoft applies to every enterprise cloud migration engagement. MAP is not a consulting methodology. It is a framework with specific deliverables, specific tools, and specific checkpoints that must be completed at each phase before the programme progresses to the next. The discipline of the MAP framework is what prevents the five failure modes described above.

Phase 1: Assess: Portfolio Discovery, Business Case, and Application Dependency Mapping

The Assess phase replaces assumptions with data. Every migration commitment made after this phase is grounded in an actual inventory of the enterprise's application portfolio.

• Application portfolio discovery: AWS Migration Evaluator (formerly TSO Logic), AWS Application Discovery Service (ADS), and optional tools including Cloudamize, or Movere generate a complete inventory of all servers (physical and virtual), operating systems and versions, application binaries and configurations, installed software, network connections and ports, storage usage, and CPU and memory utilisation over 30-90 days. Migrations built on manual spreadsheets consistently discover 20-40% more servers than the initial inventory. Each undiscovered server is a cutover risk.
• Application dependency mapping: AWS Migration Hub dependency visualisation and AWS Application Discovery Service network topology produce a map showing. Servers use it to call other servers, and applications use it to share database infrastructures. Migration waves that separate interdependent applications create production failures.
• AWS cloud migration business case development: AWS Migration Evaluator analysis of on-premises TCO, including server, storage, network, power, cooling, data centre space, licensing, and other operations. AWS pricing calculator, on the other hand, produces a quantified 3-year business case. Migration programmes without a quantified business case lose executive sponsorship at the first cost overrun.
• AWS migration strategy 7 Rs classification: Each application in the portfolio is classified as Rehost, Relocate, Replatform, Refactor, Repurchase, Retire, or Retain. The categorisation depends on priority ordering for migration waves, and per-application migration tooling and timeline. Applications classified incorrectly create expensive mid-migration discoveries.
• Security and compliance baseline assessment: AWS Well-Architected Tool security pillar assessment and compliance framework mapping (PCI-DSS AWS cloud migration compliance, HIPAA AWS cloud migration compliance, SOC 2, ISO 27001) to the AWS Shared Responsibility Model identifies which controls must be implemented before migration begins.

Phase 2: Mobilize: Landing Zone, Skills Readiness, and Migration Planning

The Mobilize phase builds the AWS landing zone Control Tower and prepares the organisation's team before any production workload moves. The landing zone is the most critical infrastructure deliverable of the entire migration programme.

Phase 3: Migrate and Modernize: Wave Planning, Execution, and Optimisation

Wave planning is not simply scheduling. It is a risk sequencing framework that ensures the migration team's tooling, procedures, and skills are most mature by the time mission-critical applications are at risk.

• Wave 1: Non-production and low-risk workloads first (dev, test, QA environments; non-customer-facing tools; archived workloads with no live traffic). Wave 1 is the programme's risk calibration mechanism. Failures discovered here are resolved before production workloads are at risk.
• Wave 2: Production workloads with low business criticality (internal business applications, HR systems, internal portals, reporting tools). Wave 2 tests production migration procedures with a bounded blast radius.
• Wave 3: Production workloads with medium business criticality (customer-facing applications with defined SLAs; applications with high transaction volumes but existing disaster recovery plans). Runbooks and rollback capabilities must be verified in Wave 2 before Wave 3 begins.
• Wave 4: Mission-critical applications last (revenue-generating customer-facing applications; applications with strict SLA requirements; applications with complex database dependencies; regulated applications requiring compliance attestation). AWS migration wave planning enterprise best practice is to migrate these last because the migration tooling, procedures, and team skills are most mature after multiple prior waves.
• Dependency-driven wave composition: applications that call each other must be in the same wave, or the calling application must tolerate a temporary on-premises-to-cloud call via VPN. The dependency map from the Assess phase drives wave composition. VPC architecture must support hybrid on-premises-to-cloud connectivity during the migration period.

AWS Application Migration Service (AWS MGN): Architecture and Operating Model for Automated Server Migration

AWS MGN application migration (formerly known as CloudEndure Migration) is the AWS-native service for automated lift and shift AWS migration. MGN uses continuous block-level replication to keep a synchronised copy of the source server in AWS, enabling migration cutovers in minutes rather than hours. It is the primary tool Mobisoft uses for Rehost-strategy applications in enterprise cloud migration programmes.

How AWS MGN Works: The Four-Stage Replication Architecture

Agent installation and initial sync

The AWS MGN Replication Agent runs on each of the source servers. It scans all volumes and connects to the AWS MGN service via TCP ports 443 (HTTPS) and 1500 (data replication). The initial sync copies data from source volumes to the staging area in AWS. Time depends on the amount of data and bandwidth. With a 1TB source volume and a 100 Mbps Internet connection, it takes 22 hours. The agent doesn't require reboots and doesn't use the source server storage I/O path. The staging area EC2 instance is a cheap Replication Server (by default t3.small), which receives data and writes it to EBS volumes in the staging area.

Continuous replication (steady state)

After the initial sync completes, MGN enters steady-state continuous replication. All write operations on the source server's volumes are captured and replicated to the staging area EBS volumes in near real-time (typically sub-second lag). The staging area is updated continuously while the source server continues to operate normally. Production traffic is not interrupted. The replication is crash-consistent: application-consistent snapshots can be configured for databases.

Testing

Before any production cutover, MGN launches a test instance from the staging area in a test VPC isolated from production. The migration team performs application testing on the test instance while the source server continues to serve production traffic. Testing can be performed multiple times before cutover. Each test launch creates a new EC2 instance from the current point-in-time state of the staging area.

Cutover

When the migration team initiates cutover: MGN completes a final replication of any changes made since the last continuous sync. It then launches the cutover instance in the production VPC and target subnet. The migration team redirects traffic via DNS update, load balancer target group change, or network reconfiguration. AWS MGN cutover downtime minutes: total cutover window is 10-30 minutes for most applications. The source server is decommissioned after validation. The final replication at cutover captures only the delta since the last continuous sync point. If continuous replication is current (sub-second lag), the final replication is near-instantaneous.

AWS MGN Configuration and Optimisation for Enterprise Migrations

The following configuration parameters govern AWS MGN replication agent setup enterprise deployments. Correct configuration prevents replication bottlenecks and ensures the cutover window stays within the planned 10-30 minute target.

AWS MGN vs Alternatives: When to Use Each

The choice of migration tooling depends on the application's migration strategy classification. AWS MGN vs alternatives is not a binary choice. Each tool has a specific scope. The table below describes when Mobisoft uses each option.

• AWS MGN (Application Migration Service): best for any OS, any application, Rehost strategy. Continuous block-level replication minimises cutover downtime with minimal disruption to the source server. Does not modernise the application during migration. Mobisoft uses this as the primary tool for all Rehost-classified applications unless excluded by licensing, OS version, or migration strategy.
• AWS Database Migration Service (DMS): best for heterogeneous database migration (Oracle to Aurora PostgreSQL, SQL Server to MySQL) and continuous change data capture for near-zero cutover downtime. Not a server migration tool; it migrates data and schema, not server configuration. Requires application-level changes when the database engine changes.
• AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (DRS): positioned as an ongoing DR service, not a migration tool. Higher ongoing cost than MGN for pure migration use cases. Mobisoft deploys this as a long-term DR solution post-migration for critical workloads and as an interim DR solution before a formal DR architecture is established.
• VMware Cloud on AWS (VMC): the execution path for the Relocate strategy. Best for organisations with a significant VMware investment that want to move to AWS at the hypervisor level — using VMware HCX for bulk/live VM migration with no conversion to native EC2 and near-zero downtime. Does not eliminate VMware licensing costs and does not modernise the application. Mobisoft uses this for a 'Relocate now, Replatform/Refactor later' strategy where a fast data-centre exit is the priority.
• AWS Server Migration Service (SMS): deprecated by AWS. No new migrations should use SMS. Existing SMS migrations should be converted to MGN.
• Native cloud-native migration (manual): for Refactor/Re-architect applications where migration involves deploying a new cloud-native architecture (ECS, Lambda, Aurora Serverless, S3/CloudFront) rather than replicating an existing server. Requires development work in addition to infrastructure migration. Mobisoft uses this for all Refactor-classified applications.

The Seven Migration Strategies (7 Rs): How Mobisoft Classifies Every Application in the Enterprise Portfolio

The AWS cloud migration 7 Rs classification portfolio framework is the taxonomy that determines what happens to each application in an enterprise cloud migration programme. Applying the wrong strategy to an application is one of the most expensive migration mistakes an enterprise can make. Applying Rehost to an application that requires Refactor creates a technically correct migration that immediately accumulates technical debt. Applying Refactor to an application that should be retired wastes engineering resources on a system that will be decommissioned.

The Complete 7 Rs Framework with Decision Criteria

Note: The distinction between Rehost and Relocate is the conversion: Rehost (via AWS MGN) converts servers into native EC2 instances, while Relocate (via VMware Cloud on AWS and HCX) keeps them as VMs on AWS-hosted VMware and never converts them.

How Mobisoft Applies the 7 Rs to a Typical 200-Server Enterprise Portfolio

Typical distribution across a 200-server enterprise portfolio:

• Rehost (35-50%): the largest single category. Typically includes all applications that are not actively developed, have no available SaaS equivalent, and are not planned for retirement. AWS MGN is the primary tool.
• Replatform (15-25%): applications where database migration to RDS, application server migration to Elastic Beanstalk, or storage migration to S3/EFS is achievable without code changes. Delivers the highest ROI for the development effort required.
• Refactor/Re-architect (5-15%): reserved for the highest-value applications where modernisation investment is justified by strategic importance. Typically, the organisation's revenue-generating customer-facing applications.
• Repurchase (10-20%): commodity business applications (HR, payroll, CRM, project management, email, collaboration) that have better SaaS equivalents. Frequently overlooked in technical migrations focused on server migration.
• Retire (15-25%): dormant or duplicate applications. Frequently, 15-25% of the enterprise portfolio has not had meaningful usage in the last 12 months. Retiring these applications before migration reduces the migration portfolio and the cloud footprint.
• Retain (5-15%): compliance-constrained applications, extremely complex legacy system maintenance, or applications with 12-month retirement plans. The retain category should be actively managed and minimised over successive migration waves.
• Relocate (0–10%, materially higher for VMware-heavy estates): applications running on VMware that move to VMware Cloud on AWS via HCX without conversion to native EC2. The split between Rehost and Relocate depends heavily on the size of the VMware footprint in a VMware-dominated data-centre exit, Relocate can be the largest single category and Rehost correspondingly smaller; in estates with little VMware, it may be zero. Typically used as a fast-exit bridge before a later Replatform or Refactor.

Database Migration with AWS DMS: Managing the Most Complex Component of Enterprise Cloud Migration

AWS DMS database migration is the most failure-prone component of enterprise cloud migration because databases have the highest combination of data criticality, technical complexity, and cutover sensitivity. Losing or corrupting production data is catastrophic. Schema compatibility, stored procedure syntax, trigger behaviour, character encoding, and replication mechanisms vary significantly across database engines. The window during which data is being transferred and the source and target are not in sync must be minimised.

The AWS DMS Architecture for Continuous Replication

Replication instance

An EC2 instance managed by AWS DMS that runs the replication software. Sits between source and target databases; reads from the source and writes to the target. Use r5.xlarge or larger for production databases; r5.2xlarge for databases above 1TB. Multi-AZ replication instance for production DMS tasks (automatic failover).

Source endpoint

Connects DMS to the source database. For source databases with binary log replication (MySQL) or WAL replication (PostgreSQL), DMS reads the transaction log for change data capture. Oracle: enable Supplemental Logging at the schema level. SQL Server: enable MS-CDC. MySQL: enable binary logging (log_bin=ON, binlog_format=ROW). PostgreSQL: set wal_level=logical. The source database must be configured to support CDC before the DMS task starts.

Target endpoint

Connects DMS to the target database with settings optimised for the bulk load and ongoing replication phases. Target bulk load settings: disable foreign key checks, disable triggers, set max_allowed_packet (MySQL), and use parallel load. For Aurora targets: use Multi-AZ deployment from the start. For RDS targets: enable automated backups before starting the DMS task.

Full load task

Initial bulk transfer of all existing data from source to target. DMS reads each table and loads data in parallel. The number of parallel load threads is configurable (typically 8-16 for large databases). LOB handling mode: limited LOB for most cases; full LOB only when LOBs cannot be truncated. Batch apply size: 500-1000 rows for balanced throughput. Target table prep mode: truncate (do nothing) to ensure a clean target before load.

Change data capture (CDC)

After the full load completes, DMS reads the source database's transaction log and applies all changes (inserts, updates, deletes) to the target in near real-time. Maintains synchronisation between source and target during the pre-cutover period. Key metric: replication latency. Acceptable cutover window: target latency consistently below 5 seconds for 30+ minutes. Monitor CDCChangesDiskSource and CDCChangesDiskTarget CloudWatch metrics.

Schema Conversion Tool (SCT)

Converts database schema and code objects (stored procedures, functions, views, triggers) from one database engine's syntax to another. Required for heterogeneous migrations (Oracle to PostgreSQL, SQL Server to MySQL). AWS DMS Schema Conversion Tool stored procedures: SCT assessment report classifies conversion issues as Simple, Medium, or Complex. Simple items convert automatically. Plan for 20-40% of stored procedures to require manual code changes in heterogeneous migrations.

The Database Migration Cutover Checklist

The AWS DMS cutover checklist database migration below reflects what Mobisoft validates before every production database cutover.

Security and Compliance During AWS Cloud Migration: Maintaining Security Posture Through the Migration Window

The migration window is the highest-risk period in the enterprise cloud journey from an AWS cloud migration security compliance perspective. During migration, workloads exist in a hybrid state, with some on-premises, some in AWS. There exist network connections between the two environments that create an attack surface, which did not exist before migration. The organisation's security team is simultaneously responsible for both the on-premises security posture as well as the emerging cloud security posture. Compliance attestations must be maintained through the migration without a gap.

The AWS Shared Responsibility Model: What Changes in the Cloud

The AWS Shared Responsibility Model changes, which security controls the organisation is responsible for. The following covers each domain, what changes, and what action is required before migration.

Physical security

• On-premises: Organisation responsible for physical data centre security (access control, CCTV, environmental controls). 
• In AWS: AWS is responsible for the physical security of AWS infrastructure (ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS certified). 
• Required action: No action required; physical security is inherited from AWS; document in the compliance audit trail.

Hypervisor and infrastructure security

• On-premises: Organisation responsible for hypervisor patching and configuration. 
• In AWS: AWS manages the EC2 hypervisor, underlying hardware, network, and virtualisation layer. 
• Required action: No action required; inherited from AWS; document in the compliance audit trail.

Operating system security

• On-premises: Organisation responsible for OS patching, hardening, and monitoring. 
• In AWS: Organisation responsible for OS security on EC2 instances (same as on-premises). 
• Required action: Establish AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager for automated OS patching before migration; define patch baseline and patch schedule.

Network security

• On-premises: Organisation controls data centre network (firewall rules, network segmentation, VLAN configuration). 
• In AWS: Organisation controls VPC security groups, NACLs, route tables, and VPC peering while AWS manages the underlying network. 
• Required action: Design VPC architecture with security groups and NACLs that replicate or improve upon on-premises network segmentation; test before the first production wave.

Data encryption

• On-premises: Organisation responsible for data encryption at rest and in transit. 
• In AWS: Organisation responsible for application-level and volume-level encryption; AWS provides encryption primitives (KMS, ACM, EBS encryption). 
• Required action: Enable EBS encryption at rest on all migrated volumes (using AWS KMS CMK); enable RDS encryption; establish certificate management using ACM.

Identity and access management

• On-premises: Organisation manages Active Directory, LDAP, or on-premises IAM. 
• In AWS: Organisation manages IAM roles, users, and policies in AWS; AWS Identity Centre for SSO across accounts. 
• Required action: Implement AWS IAM Identity Centre before migration; federate with existing AD or IdP; implement least-privilege IAM roles; eliminate long-lived access keys.

Logging and monitoring

• On-premises: Organisation manages SIEM, syslog, and on-premises security monitoring. 
• In AWS: Organisation responsible for CloudTrail, CloudWatch, VPC Flow Logs, and security monitoring in AWS. 
• Required action: Enable CloudTrail in all accounts from Day 1 of landing zone creation; configure VPC Flow Logs; integrate CloudWatch with the organisation's SIEM; configure Security Hub for centralised findings.

Compliance Framework Mapping for AWS Migrations

PCI-DSS AWS cloud migration compliance: 

• Key AWS services: AWS WAF, ACM for TLS certificates, VPC with private subnets for the CDE, CloudTrail for audit logging, AWS Config (PCI rules), AWS KMS for encryption key management, Security Hub (PCI-DSS standard), and GuardDuty for threat detection. 
• Critical pre-migration control: define the Cardholder Data Environment (CDE) AWS accounts and VPCs. Enable AWS Security Hub PCI-DSS standard before migrating CDE workloads. Implement AWS WAF in front of all CDE-facing endpoints. 
• Resources: AWS PCI-DSS Compliance Quick Start; AWS Artifact for PCI-DSS Attestation of Compliance.

HIPAA AWS Cloud Migration Compliance

• Key AWS services: AWS CloudHSM or KMS for PHI encryption, private VPCs with no internet gateway for PHI workloads, CloudTrail for audit requirements, S3 with server-side encryption for PHI storage, RDS with encryption for PHI databases, and Amazon Macie for PHI discovery in S3.
• Critical pre-migration control: Execute the AWS Business Associate Agreement (BAA) before migrating PHI workloads. Enable encryption across EBS, RDS, and S3. Configure CloudTrail with immutable S3 Object Lock log storage.
• Resources: AWS HIPAA Compliance Whitepaper, AWS HIPAA Eligible Services List, and AWS Artifact for BAA.

SOC 2 Compliance

• Key AWS services: CloudTrail for auditability, AWS Config for configuration management, GuardDuty for threat detection, IAM for access controls, CloudWatch for availability monitoring, and AWS KMS for encryption.
• Critical pre-migration control: Map SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria to AWS controls. Document shared responsibility ownership. Establish CloudWatch dashboards and monitoring baselines before migration.
• Resources: AWS SOC 2 Compliance Whitepaper and AWS Artifact for AWS SOC Reports.

ISO 27001 Compliance

• Key AWS services: AWS Control Tower for governance, AWS Config for information security management, CloudTrail for audit trails, Security Hub for security monitoring, and IAM for access control management.
• Critical pre-migration control: Map ISO 27001 Annex A controls to AWS services. Expand the ISMS scope to include AWS infrastructure. Implement Control Tower guardrails for access control and operations security requirements.
• Resources: AWS ISO 27001 Compliance Whitepaper, AWS Artifact for ISO 27001 Certificate, and AWS Control Tower.

Post-Migration Well-Architected Review and Cost Optimisation: Making the Migration Business Case Real

Six cost optimisation techniques drive the 25-40% cloud spend reduction that justifies the migration business case:

The Reliability Pillar: Designing for AWS-Native High Availability

Rehosted workloads on single EC2 instances have the same availability characteristics as on-premises servers: single points of failure mitigated only by AWS's underlying infrastructure reliability. Post-migration reliability improvements are the highest-value architectural changes for the reliability pillar.

• Multi-AZ deployment for stateful tiers: RDS Multi-AZ provides automatic failover to a synchronous standby in a different Availability Zone (RPO near-zero, RTO 1-2 minutes for most failure scenarios). ElastiCache Multi-AZ for in-memory caching. EFS Multi-AZ for shared file storage. The highest-impact single reliability improvement for Rehost workloads is migrating from self-managed databases on EC2 to RDS Multi-AZ, which provides automatic failover without any application changes.
• Auto Scaling Groups for stateless tiers: stateless application servers (web tier, API tier, worker processes) placed behind an Application Load Balancer with an Auto Scaling Group. The ASG replaces unhealthy instances automatically and scales based on demand.
• AWS Backup for consistent backup management: AWS Backup provides policy-based backup for EC2 (EBS snapshots), RDS, DynamoDB, EFS, and other AWS services from a single console. Backup policies are defined once and applied via AWS Organizations to all accounts. This replaces the heterogeneous backup tools typically used on-premises.
• Chaos Engineering with AWS Fault Injection Simulator (FIS): FIS enables controlled fault injection experiments (terminate instances, inject network latency, fail over RDS) in the AWS environment to verify that the system handles failures as designed. Mobisoft recommends FIS experiments after each WAF reliability review to validate that reliability improvements are working as expected.

Mobisoft's AWS Cloud Migration Practice: Engagement Model, Team, and Differentiators

Mobisoft's cloud migration consulting enterprise practice brings together AWS migration expertise, application development capability, and domain knowledge in regulated industries to deliver AWS cloud migration services that go beyond infrastructure relocation to genuine cloud-native modernisation. The practice is not an AWS reseller or an infrastructure management firm. It is a product engineering company that applies engineering discipline to cloud migration and post-migration modernisation.

What Makes Mobisoft's Cloud Migration Practice Different

Application development capability alongside migration expertise

Most cloud migration consultancies have infrastructure expertise but not application development capability. When a Refactor migration requires code changes, they subcontract to a development team. Mobisoft's AWS data engineers perform both the migration infrastructure work and the application modernisation work in a single integrated engagement. Refactor migrations require code changes (monolith decomposition, database engine change, serverless conversion) that infrastructure-only migration teams cannot deliver. Mobisoft removes this boundary.

Domain expertise in regulated industries

Mobisoft's domain practices (healthcare HIPAA, logistics FMCSA, fintech PCI-DSS, enterprise SaaS) mean that the cloud migration team understands the compliance requirements affecting the landing zone design, application architecture, and data handling before the first conversation about technical architecture. A generic cloud migration team that encounters a HIPAA-covered healthcare application mid-migration must discover PHI encryption, BAA, and audit logging requirements as they go. Mobisoft's healthcare domain team designs these requirements into the landing zone from the assessment phase.

AWS Well-Architected Review as a deliverable, not an aspiration

Every Mobisoft cloud migration engagement includes a formal AWS Well-Architected Review for each migrated workload, completed and presented to the client's technical leadership within 30 days of migration completion. The WAF review includes a prioritised remediation plan with estimated cost savings and estimated effort for each finding. Most cloud migration projects declare completion at cutover and move on. The cost optimisation and reliability improvements that justify the migration business case are in the post-migration WAF review. Mobisoft's engagement model does not allow the WAF review to be skipped.

AWS Migration Acceleration Programme (MAP) funding eligibility

For eligible enterprises, AWS provides MAP funding to offset migration programme costs. AWS has committed hundreds of millions of dollars annually to MAP funding for enterprise migrations. Mobisoft, as an AWS Partner, can support clients through the MAP application process and maximise MAP funding eligibility based on portfolio size, migration wave, and post-migration commitment. MAP funding can offset 20-40% of the total migration programme cost for eligible enterprise clients.

Post-migration managed services and FinOps

Mobisoft's engagement model includes an optional layer of post-migration cloud maintenance and support services: ongoing Well-Architected reviews, cost optimisation monitoring (Savings Plan coverage, right-sizing recommendations), security posture monitoring (Security Hub findings, GuardDuty alerts), and incident response.  The most common post-migration failure mode is cost overrun due to a lack of ongoing FinOps discipline. Reserved Instance and Savings Plan coverage requires active management as the workload changes over time. Mobisoft's FinOps practice maintains the 25-40% cost reduction achieved at migration rather than allowing it to erode.

The Mobisoft Cloud Migration Engagement Phases

The Cloud Migration That Justifies Its Business Case: What Success Looks Like at 12 Months

A successful enterprise AWS cloud migration within 12 months looks specific. The majority of the application portfolio is running in AWS. The cloud spend is 25-40% below the equivalent on-premises TCO. The security posture is measurably better than on-premises: Security Hub findings are tracked and resolved, GuardDuty threats are being detected and responded to, and IAM least-privilege is enforced. Application reliability is measurably better: RDS Multi-AZ has been implemented for critical databases, Auto Scaling is managing the stateless tiers, and AWS Backup is managing the backup policy. The team has the skills and processes to operate the cloud environment without the specialist consultants who led the migration.

Getting to that 12-month outcome requires the AWS MAP Migration Acceleration Programme discipline: the Assess phase that builds the AWS cloud migration business case on actual portfolio data rather than assumptions; the Mobilize phase that builds the AWS landing zone Control Tower and the team's skills before the first production workload migrates; the Migration and Modernize phase that executes in waves with the mission-critical applications last; and the post-migration AWS Well-Architected Framework review that converts the infrastructure relocation into the cloud economics and cloud agility that justified the migration in the first place.Mobisoft's cloud migration consulting enterprise practice starts with a 2-4 week assessment engagement that produces a quantified business case, a complete portfolio inventory, an AWS migration strategy 7 Rs classification for every application, and a migration wave plan. Whether the enterprise proceeds with Mobisoft for the full migration or uses the assessment output to manage an internal migration, the assessment is the most valuable first step any enterprise can take before committing to a cloud migration programme.

Nitin Lahoti

Co-Founder and Director

Read more

Nitin Lahoti is the Co-Founder and Director at Mobisoft Infotech. He has 15 years of experience in Design, Business Development and Startups. His expertise is in Product Ideation, UX/UI design, Startup consulting and mentoring. He prefers business readings and loves traveling.

Read less

Share Article